Actually, with convicts you'll find that it's very hard to ever get a pure pink or pure 'striped'. The fry from my male pink(white) convict and female striped convict were mostly striped but pretty "washed-out". Almost all had stripes though on some only lightly visible. You can crack open those genetics books you never read

look for the recessive/dominant sections. ie RRxrr or RrxRR etc.... point being is different genotype may still produce same phenotype(appearance). For example let's say a "gene" coding for color-pattern has two alleles that are identical, be they both dominant or both recessive. You would say RR is homozygous and dominant and for recessive alleles you would use lowercase ie rr. If your fish has Rr alleles coding in a gene for a specific trait you would say that it is heterozygous for that trait since one allele is dominant(R) and the other allele(r) is recessive. Let's say that we look at the "striped-pattern" gene. Let's assume AA for the gene gives the "striped" phenotype and so does Aa since the dominant "A" takes precedence and also gives the "striped" phenotype. Say that BB allele codes for "pink convict". So BB and Bb will both produce "pink convict" coding in that gene.
With bb (both recessive) so "pink convict" phenotype is not expressed. As is with "aa" where both alleles are also homozygous recessive and "striped-convict" phenotype is not expressed. Let's say you cross a male pink convict aaBb with a potent female(striped) with a genotype of AAbb. In this case the male(aaBb) can contribute two different "variations" of alleles, either aB or ab to the offspring. The female(AAbb) can only contribue one combo which is Ab. So if you remember your Punnet Squares:
fromMale->|---aB---|---ab---|
----------------------------|
-----Ab---|--AaBb--|--Aabb--|
So basically half the fry should have the AaBb genotype and half the fry the Aabb genotype. Now about the "phenotype", half the fry(Aabb) should look more or less like honest to goodness regular "striped" convicts because of the Aa where one allele is dominant for the "striped" so it wins against the homozygous "recessive" bb gene for "pink". But how about the AaBb?? Here BOTH genes are turned on somewhat, Aa for Striped and Bb for "pink". Both are heterozygous having one dominant and one recessive allele. These will be the really "washed-out" striped convicts, or the fry which look like "pink"(white) convicts but seem to have some kind of light stripes barely apparent. We could go on and say that some "genes" are more "powerfull" than others. Maybe, just maybe the "striped" gene is more powerfull than the "pink" gene so that even if in genotype(AaBb) they are equal, that in PHENOTYPE(appearance) it looks as if "striped" has the upper hand by a little.
WHAT the heck got into me!!! OK, well folks use info at your own risk, I hope I didn't make any big blunders, I havn't done any biology for long time. (For those interested, my BS was in Biology, specializations in biochemistry and molecular biology.)
Hehe, hey if you're really bored try crossing the FRY from the previous example like an AaBb with another AaBb or with an Aabb.(For AaBb X AaBb ,you'll have 16 different results since each parent can give four different variations of alleles AB, Ab, aB, and ab. So 1/16th of the fry will be AABB and 1/16th aabb.) Man, and I hated this stuff in school!!
------------------
Joe
www.cichlidfish.com [This message has been edited by cichlidfish (edited 10-16-2001).]
[This message has been edited by cichlidfish (edited 10-16-2001).]